Thursday, April 10, 2014

Haterizing Degrowth(tm)

We're sorry for living, Mother Earth.
<rant>

One cannot long tarry long amongst preppers without discovering that they come in three distinct types.  There's the anti-government preppers to whom everything is a conspiracy of hyper-competent elites dedicated to throwing us all in FEMA camps for some reason. Alex Jones would be a prime example of this brand. For lack of a more offensive word, let's call them conservatives.

Then there's those theorists and treehuggers of the left side, including the organized Degrowth movement.  Some of them are organic-fanatics who eschew chemicals and corporations* as a snail avoids salt.  Others of them seem convinced that the survival of humanity is not the issue, but the problem, and spend their lives flying to exotic places to warn their fellow flyers of the planetary dangers of human flight. All of them love to hear themselves and maybe even others talk about social justice and to call for a feminist or people-of-color or GLBTQIWTF understanding of how straight white guys are the root of the problem. Call them liberals.

Then there's everyone else.  Like six of us it seems sometimes.

I like the conservatives.  They are genuinely good people who care deeply for their families and communities. If they have a shortcoming, it is that they believe that everyone else is as competent as they are. This leads them to assume that, rather than things falling as they do because of pride, laziness, ass-covering, and taking-advantage-of-circumstances, they fall that way because of 400 banking families with a multi-generational plan to destroy what they already rule.  But given my choice, these are the folks I really want to be surrounded by in SHTF, bad tattoos and all.  Because guns.

I like everyone else, especially those with toes dipped daintily in both camps, like myself.

I really try to like the liberals.  Really, I do. And I like those who actually do farm and raise small livestock and get out of debt and improve the land and stock up.  Being a liberal doesn't always mean you have to be a fool. The problem is that that's exactly what it means most of the time.

We are going into a period of stagnation and maybe even permanent economic contraction. Charles Hugh Smith has described this necessary degrowth as
"...Use the thing until it cannot be repaired... Buy local rather than than global-corporate whenever feasible. Crave less, need less, want less, resist the brainwashing of 24/7 marketing. Learn to become a person who does not need corporate-status signifiers for a sense of identity." 
And that's all good advice that I suspect we'll be taking one way or the other. You don't have to be Amish, but you don't need a $100 Nike swoosh on your shoe, either.

But the problem is that for a certain class of liberals, they can't Just Do It! just do it, they need to make a secular religion out of maths, complete with high priests and devils and salvation.

And pages and pages of blatherous Degrowth scripture:
"Bodies, interdependence, and caring relations are not the whole story, however, for ecological subjects. Places, the locations of human habitation, also have to meet certain conditions if ecological subjects are to survive, much less realize justice. We are located beings, a matter that proves integral to our possibilities...

We can think about our embeddedness, what we might also call our emplacement, in at least two ways: geographical and social. We have evolved as corporeal creatures within relations of care...
Other salient features of social context involve the dense web of social and institutional structures and processes within which we navigate as embodied beings. Social norms and economic structures and relations significantly shape bodies and subjectivities. These social structures and relations generate injustice to the extent that they expand possibilities for some and contract them for others."
I'm pretty sure the FEMA camp fearers are going to be just fine when FEMA never shows up at their door.  And I'm pretty sure that liberal organic farmers are going to be just fine - in fact, they may finally learn that if you want to truly help people, the absolute worst way to do it is to create a government program to help them. Besides, there's likely not going to be much of a government to do anything, much less anything nice.

But the blathering liberals, the campus liberals, the feminist theorists and the tree-hugging sobbers with PhDs in anything with "Studies" in the title, these people are going to be even more of a problem to real society than the poor and dependent-upon-government masses.

And the reason is that while the welfare mom knows she's dependent, the blathering, over-educated nitwit who talks about emplacement with a straight face has not the faintest idea how dependent she is on a wasteful and bloated system that tolerates and even rewards nonsense and foolishness. She gets to live pretty freaking well while providing nothing but a cacophony of subjectivities to other noise merchants who nod at, smile at, and publish this drivel in glossy, taxpayer-supported journals.

They are able to do so because our current economy produces so much overage that we need an entire class of consumers who don't produce anything just to keep things in balance. Liberals don't realize it's them.

In the actual degrowth upon which they pontificate but do not comprehend, when we don't have so much and when it doesn't come to us so easily, those who rattled on the most about the social justice aspects of degrowth will quickly learn that there remains no market for subjectivities. There will sit in permanent economic contraction no audience before which the offended or the entitled or the trendy jabberer can preen. No one is going to sacrifice to fly them to Madagascar every winter for conferences on embeddedness.  No one is going to care very much that they even exist.

Everything upon which they have invested their futile lives will be revealed as of less worth than 8 cubic feet of good compost.  These clueless wonders are going to come abso-freaking-lutely unglued** when they have to earn their daily bread or starve. Yet they will face the choice anyway, as will we all.

In a world without economic bloat, three things will be valued: wisdom, hard labor, and force. And anyone who has ever uttered the sentence We are located beings*** is likely unfamiliar with any of them.

</rant>

* Other than Apple, obviously.
** I'm glad they hate guns so much.
*** unless standing next to a signal fire and staring up at a search plane.

4 comments:

  1. We are located beings, a matter that proves integral to our possibilities...

    wut? That reads like someone who is trying to say something simple in a complicated manner because
    a)they want to sound smarter than they are.
    b)they are trying confuse people about what they are saying
    c) they have their own jargon that lower life forms don't understand
    d)English isn't their first language
    e)all of the above

    One of the things I'm going to enjoy about the coming clusterfutastrophe is watching the predicament these people find themselves in.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wee! Spin that carousel again, daddy. That was fun!

    Well, the other problem? Even if, as I may in theory include myself in the six (though in truth I do have some doubts if I fit in the non-conspiracy circles... if too, is it a conspiracy when it is done publicly)? We... even we... don't exactly always like each other or agree. For my sort of idealism, however, that is... for the most part... how I like it. It's a good thing to disagree, and strongly. If you don't shoot each other over it? That, my friend, is civilization. It's as good as it gets, I think. And I like it just so.

    Now... bugger off! But have a good day storming the castle, planting potatoes, or whatnot. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. The thing about degrowthers? I sort of forgot to say this earlier, then ran out of time when I thought about it... These are people who believe in genocide, against pretty much everybody. While they say they hate white men, they have this fascination with putting them in power, sure that they will do "what is needed". Sure, Dems, but white male Dems. Even they realize a black man, top of the class for them, can't get it done. Republicans won't do it, they will just follow along, making money on the side of whatever Dems do. Too stupid or lazy to do what degrowthers want, or... something. Evil? Heh. Talk about turning a notion on it's head.

    The thing that bugs me is that degrowthers have to realize they are on the chopping block. Now, I think they dither between believing they deserve it, as people, and people have to be gotten rid of, and believing they will not be in the lineup. History has shown that these are the first people put down. Revolutions eat their own first. Less a rule than a law of nature?

    You can't reason with people who are split between genocide of everyone else and suicide by government. If I had the power, I wouldn't arrest, technically, or hospitalize. I think they are irreparably insane. I would merely patriot them with nations that run things as they see fit, such as North Korea. A small fee, and N.K. would take them in a heartbeat. Or just a little oil and food. What they do with them after that would be none of my concern, as what N.K. does with it's citizens is nothing I can do much about even now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Revolutions eat their own first.

    It's not the Romanovs who are most surprised to be against the wall when the revolution succeeds, it's the Trotskyites.

    ReplyDelete